Think deeper.
Discover faster.

Ask a hard question. Vettan searches the web, reads the most relevant sources, and writes a report with citations you can check.

You'll sign in or create an account first. Your question is kept.

View recorded example

RAG vs fine-tuning: Which should a small team choose?

4 focused searches

  1. RAG vs fine-tuning for small teams
  2. cost-effectiveness of RAG systems 2025
  3. performance comparison RAG fine-tuning
  4. best practices for implementing RAG

5 sources

  1. arxiv.org/html/2505.15179v1 (opens in a new tab)
  2. orkes.io/blog/rag-best-practices (opens in a new tab)
  3. montecarlo.ai/blog-rag-vs-fine-tuning (opens in a new tab)

From the report, verbatim

Key Takeaways

RAG is more accessible for small teams, requiring less infrastructure and expertise compared to fine-tuning.

Understanding RAG and Its Advantages

Notably, RAG requires minimal training time beyond the initial indexing of documents, making it particularly attractive for small teams that may lack the resources for extensive model training .

Recorded example from Oct 19, 2026. Real output, replayed.

How Vettan works

Follow one real question from start to finished report.

  1. 01 Question

    You ask in plain language

    No keywords or operators. Ask it the way you would ask a colleague.

    Question

    RAG vs fine-tuning: Which should a small team choose?

  2. 02 Plan

    It splits the question into focused searches

    One search rarely covers a question like this. Vettan splits it into focused searches, one for each angle.

    1. 1RAG vs fine-tuning for small teams
    2. 2cost-effectiveness of RAG systems 2025
    3. 3performance comparison RAG fine-tuning
    4. 4best practices for implementing RAG

  3. 03 Search

    The searches run in parallel

    The same four searches run at the same time instead of one after another. In this run, all four succeeded.

    Searches 1–4 from the plan above, running at once

    1. 1Done
    2. 2Done
    3. 3Done
    4. 4Done

    4 of 4 succeeded

  4. 04 Sources

    The most relevant pages are kept

    Duplicates are dropped and results are ranked, so only the most relevant pages are read.

    1. arxiv.orgcited 1×/html/2505.15179v1 (opens in a new tab)
    2. orkes.iocited 1×/blog/rag-best-practices (opens in a new tab)
    3. montecarlo.aicited 2×/blog-rag-vs-fine-tuning (opens in a new tab)
    4. www.ibm.comcited 2×/think/topics/rag-vs-fine-tuning (opens in a new tab)
    5. www.matillion.comcited 2×/blog/rag-vs-fine-tuning-enterprise-ai-strategy-guide (opens in a new tab)

  5. 05 Write

    The report is written from those pages

    Citations go into the text as it is written, next to the points they support.

  6. 06 Result

    Each cited point links back to its page

    You can open any source and check the claim yourself.

    Read the full report

Inspect a real report

Below is unedited output from one recorded run. Select a citation to see its source, then open the page to check it yourself.

Recorded output, unedited. Oct 19, 2026

RAG vs fine-tuning: Which should a small team choose?

The Case for Fine-Tuning

Fine-tuning involves retraining a model on a specific dataset to improve performance on targeted tasks. This method can achieve very high accuracy, particularly in narrow applications where sufficient training data is available . However, the process is resource-intensive, requiring a robust machine learning pipeline, labeled datasets, and significant computational power, which can be prohibitive for smaller teams .

What else you can do

Research is rarely one question. Vettan keeps the thread.

Ask a follow-up

Follow-up questions keep the context of the conversation.

Find it later

Your research is saved. Rename it, favorite it, or delete it.

Listen to a report

Hear any report in one of 6 voices, or download it as an MP3.

Ask out loud

Speak your question instead of typing it. English, in supported browsers.

Good to know

Private by default

Your history is private to your account.

Yours to delete

Delete any research, or your whole account, at any time.

Honest about gaps

If the searches find nothing usable, Vettan says so instead of answering anyway.

Open source

The code is public under the MIT license.

Vettan reads up to 5 sources per question and can still be wrong. Check the sources before you rely on an answer.

Stop reading ten tabs.

Ask Vettan something you actually need answered.

You'll sign in or create an account first. Your question is kept.